|
|
 |
 |
Sep 26, 2006
A Wandr'er they called him, such paths did he tread,
forever his feet moving, but no place for his head.
"My goal" he said was this, "to arrive safely at home",
athough shrouded were his steps, and heavy were their toll.
Mist cov'red ground beneath, and thorns there were in masse,
and if this weren't enough, a break shew'd in his path.
Now two ways there were, a dilemma did he face,
which way should he walk, for he could not stand in place.
Though he knew not why, he chose the path forlorn,
for though it was less traveled by, this choice was never mourned.
Here the story comes to me, although I must admit it seems,
that I knoweth not which paths to tread, and evil fills my heart with dread.
Fear grips my heart fast, as I see the less travelled road,
but know that for all its pains, 'tis the one to me was showed.
In silvian darkness still evils lie, and wish from good my heart to pry,
despair and disdain utter their cries, confusing my mind with myriad lies.
Armed I must go into the night, ready to struggle for my very own life,
and so now this great battle begins, the mighty onslaught comes intense,
I fight wide eyed for life itself, striking swords like nothing hence.
Ev'ry day the path winds on, the battle's fought, our spirits moan,
but until light shines from Heaven's throne, may it be, His will be done.
Posted at 10:07 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Jul 22, 2006
This essay of sorts is for the modern church, and not for the unbelieving world. Though the world certainly need to hear God's voice, this essay presupposes a Biblical background and worldview. Those who do not have such could raise many objections against both sides of this argument. Some of these objections might even be valid. However, that would require an entirely different approach in this essay. That said, I address this to the Church, in order that it may not be lead into deception, but may learn to hear and obey God accurately.
"I will question you, and you shall answer me!" These are among the first words that God makes in reply to Job in the ancient Hebrew book of the same name. Job was severely tested by God to prove to Satan that Job would be faithful to Him even in extreme adversity. Job and his friends wrestled with the question of why a man who loved and obeyed God would suffer such affliction. They believed that only those who had sinned against God would be punished as Job had been. However, after a long silence, God finally spoke. God's oration proved that such puny questions as Job and his mortal friends had asked paled in comparison to the majesty of His sovereignty. God answered none of their questions, but only replied with more questions, none of which Job or his friends could answer. Thus Job was vindicated in his faithfulness to God, and God was duly revered.
The story of Job is an example of how God communicates with his people. In this case, there was heavenly silence until the right time. However, when God finally spoke, it was loud and clear. Anyone who has studied the Hebrew Scriptures knows that God spoke to His people Israel "Though the prophets at many times and in various ways" (Heb 1:1). Countless examples could be cited of The Angel of The Lord appearing to the patriarchs, and the visions and utterances given to the prophets, from Samuel through Malachi. Even if by some chance the Prophets could not clearly hear God's words to them, they never showed that uncertainty when proclaiming His messages to the nation of Israel.
Is this also the case for our day and time? Is God most often silent, only speaking at just the right time, and then clearly, as with Job? Or must we strive to listen to his voice before we can hear? Certainly, the Hebrew Scriptures advocate listening. For example, the Psalmist exhorts his listeners, "When you are on your beds, search your hearts and be silent" (Ps. 4:4). King Solomon urges the followers of Elohim to "Guard your steps when you go near to the house of God. Go near to listen rather than to offer the sacrifice of fools...do not be quick with your mouth, do not be hasty in your heart to utter anything before God. God is in heaven, and you are on earth, so let your words be few" (Ecc. 5:1-2).
Then there is the famous story in 1 Kings 19 that is often used when talking about listening to God. This is when the prophet Elijah has just defeated the prophets of Ba'al (The chief deity of the pagan peoples in Palestine). However, he still fights great discouragement, and flees to "Horeb, the mountain of God" (v. 8). A great fire, a powerful earthquake, and a mighty wind shook the mountain, but "The Lord was not in" any of them. The Lord finally spoke to his servant through a "Gentle whisper". The Lord encouraged Elijah, who after this incident went to call Elisha to him in preparation for further ministry.
Certainly, there are other relevant passages in the Hebrew Scriptures. However, we live in the 21st century western world, having inherited Greco-Roman thought patterns, and not in the 8th century B.C. Near East. Our lives are radically different. Further, those of us who profess Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior now live under the covenant of His blood, and not under the old Hebrew covenant. Thus, the important question here is this: How did God's communication with his people before Christ relate to his communication with his people now? Certainly, God is not a man, that he should change his mind! (See 1 Sam. 15:29). While we know that the God of the Hebrews spoke to them in various ways, were any of those ways uncertain or subjective? Or were they more objective and clear, perhaps even auditory? It's not entirely certain how God spoke to the prophets. However, it seems clear that while being quiet and listening are advocated, when God wished to speak to his people the communication was clear. Of course most of the time they didn't listen, but that was due to their hardness of hearts, and not the difficulty of perceiving the message itself.
Fast forward to the New Covenant Era, specifically the present church. Does God still speak to us today? If so, how? If not, why not? I have heard many different voices in the Christian community today telling us that we must take time to "Listen to God." Some say that he "speaks" through friends, media, circumstances, the Scriptures, books, and more. Now, certainly nobody means to say that God speaks audibly in any of these sources. However, it seems that God is somehow trying to communicate through these mediums. Is this really the case? If so, is it working?
First of all, we know for certain that "In these last days [God] has spoken to us through his Son" who is sovereign over all the universe. Thus, Christ is a message directly from God. By reading through the gospel narratives about Jesus, it's clear that this message is one of love, redemption, forgiveness, and life. Eternal life. A holy life. Jesus' life and mission are about as clear of a message as we could get. God becomes man, makes radical claims, dies, and comes to life again. What could be more clear that something amazing is happening here?
The issue becomes when many try to take this message meant for all who believe in Christ and try to make it deeply personal. Who in the church hasn't heard phrases like, "I believe that God is telling me to do this or that..." or "God told me just this morning that..." or "I just think that through such and such a medium God is telling me such and such..."? Does God give us such specific guidance? Or is the message of his written Word (where there can be no doubt that he has spoken clearly) and his Son sufficient?
Let us ask a few questions to assess this. First, we know that when God spoke to the prophets long ago, His words, through their mouths, were written down as inspired Scripture. Certainly, if an all-powerful God has really spoken, it should be written down right? Who doesn't want to know what God has said? (Of course, sadly enough, many don't) If the bona fide words of God were written down and recorded as such back then, should not the same be true in the New Covenant era? So, it must be asked: For those who claim that God "spoke" to them and said such and such, if He really said this, why not write it down and equate it with the rest of Scripture? The same goes for modern prophets who claim to have "A word from God". However, are these written down as Scripture? Of course not! The idea seems absurd. The Bible is a closed canon; nothing more can be added to it. If nothing else, shouldn't these supposed messages from God be widely circulated to prove their trustworthiness? After all, in the OT times, if a prophet claimed to prophecy in the name of the Lord, yet his prophecies did not come true, he was a false prophet and was to be stoned. To death. Apparently God didn't care for people misrepresenting him. For those of us who believe that, "God is not a man, that he should change his mind", it makes sense that He still does not care for misrepresentation. So, we don't want to go around saying that God is saying lots of things that he isn't really saying. Make sense?
So what does the New Testament have to say about how God speaks to his church? Because the Gospels are before the advent of the Church, we must start with Acts, the book that chronicles the rise of the Church. Further, "Though the book of Acts is only one book of twenty-seven in the New Testament, it is virtually the only one that gives evidence of this kind of thing." (Koukl) In this book, there are 14 times that God directly communicates with somebody. (8:26-29; 9:10; 10:11; 10:22; 12:7; 13:2-4; 15:28; 16:6; 16:10; 18:9; 21:4; 21:11; 22:16; 23:11). How exactly did God speak on those occasions?
"Of those fourteen, three were visions, two were angels, three were prophetic words, and four were Jesus either speaking or appearing. Finally, on two occasions the Holy Spirit spoke in some manner that we're not sure of, but in those cases He did speak very clearly in at least one of the cases. The other one we're not sure of because it just said He prohibited Paul from entering Asia" (Koukl).
But the most important point is that, "In virtually every case the communications from God were clear. The recipient did not have to develop an ability to hear" (Koukl). Further, on two of these occasions the recipients were not even believers! Neither Saul of Tarsus on the road to Damascus nor the gentile centurion Cornelius knew God when he spoke to them, one by an angel, the other by a vision. Not only that, but Saul was vehemently opposed to God! If God can speak to those who hate Him, certainly he can speak clearly to his servants. Finally, it seems that messages by angels, visions, and Jesus' words are clear enough to be without ambiguity to the recipient. Who would doubt God's message today if an angel appeared to him?
It appears that there is little precedent in Scripture that one has to exert one's self to listen to God. Rather, it seems that when God wanted to tell somebody something, he did it. It was clear. No questions asked.
Let us put this in another light. We believe that God is all-powerful, that is, omnipotent. We also believe that He used mortal, fallible men to write his unerring, perfect Scriptures. Now, men make mistakes. However, if God is all powerful then certainly he can use that power to help imperfect men in a perfect task. Agreed? Now, for those who say that we need to be quiet and listen to God, why is that? We have seen that, from Acts, when God wanted to speak, it was almost always very clear. And most of the time, people were not actively listening. So, if we say that we can't hear God because we're not listening, does that mean that God is not powerful enough to be heard over the rest of our world? If God is trying to speak to us but cannot be heard, then that implies that God is not all-powerful (Koukl). Certainly, an all powerful God that can create the universe out of nothing, manage legions of angels, become a man, raise himself from the dead, and start a worldwide movement could also communicate with us clearly.
"If God is all-knowing and all-powerful, He never "tries" anything. He never makes an attempt, in the sense that He gives it a go to see if it happens. No. Whatever God purposes to accomplish, He accomplishes. He knows all the facts and has the power to complete what He sets out to do" (Koukl).
Thus, if God wants to speak to us, he will. Clearly. Greg Koukl, head of Stand to Reason, concludes that,
"The New Testament records nothing like a still, small voice that whispers gently in our spiritual ear. Nor does the Old Testament, as far as I can tell. Instead, we focus on the only Word of God that we are commanded to seek, that we are commanded to understand, and that we are commanded to obey."
Perhaps when people say that "God is speaking" to them, they only mean to say that they are seeing God's truth in a situation, and not really hearing something new from God. For example, if somebody is watching a movie, and there is a scene that powerfully depicts forgiveness at a time in their life where forgiveness is needed, it will seem that God is "speaking" to them through this movie. However, I think it makes more sense to say that that movie, more than likely coming from ungodly minds, still has sufficient glimmers of truth to grab ahold of for those who already know the truth. Only one who knew of God's perfect forgiveness would think they heard His voice when they saw that scene. The same goes when reading books, or speaking to others, and other means of communication. When we are dealing with issues in our lives, we look for answers. When we have a framework of the Word of Truth in our minds, we can then take specifics from books, people, etc that fit into this framework. However, if we did not know the truth, then these very same situations that now may be said to "speak" to us would mean nothing. Both logically and personally, I believe this is shaky ground. In the end, there seems no conclusive evidence that makes "Hearing from God" in these situations any more than subjective and emotional, even a form of wish-fulfillment.
On another note, however, what about those times when it really feels like the Spirit is speaking to us or giving us special insight? Is it just emotion, or perhaps is there something more? I will give a few personal examples of when I felt like God was trying to say something. Whether he was or not, I don't know; perhaps it was only a reflection of my knowledge of the Truth in my present situation. Regardless, I will desribe them.
The first was one day before a small group meeting. I believe I was in the apartment, getting ready to go to campus. However, not long before I left, I got an unexplicable urge to simply be quiet, and pray. Pray for what I had no idea. However, that urge seemed almost undeniable. Rationally, I don't know why that would have been. Regardless, later that evening, we found out that one individual was experienceing great emotional agony that was before unbeknownst to the group. It was almost like that pain was reflected and I felt it - though shadowy - a couple of hours before.
The second was when I was in prayer one night, struggling over different aspects of my future. I again had an unexplicable feeling that somebody (An angel perhaps?) was putting his hand on my shoulder and saying something to the effect of, "Wait, my child, be patient. The time will come. In the meantime all things have their reason. Do not be anxious." Now, all of that is general truth found in the Scriptures, so it could have easily been generated by my own frusterated mind looking for comfort. But that was not the effect that I got at the time.
Those two examples are my subjective side of the argument. However, in light of Scripture and reason, it appears that God speaks almost exclusively through his Son and through his Word far more than any subjective, "Spiritual" experiences.
Finally, if God can speak to us, can the opposite also be true? Can Satan speak to us as well? Certainly there are many lies in this world, and many temptations, though James says that, "Each one is tempted when by his own evil desires he is dragged away and enticed..." (1:14). But if Satan is competing for our souls, why wouldn't he try to speak to us as well? Of course, Satan is not omnipresent and cannot speak to everybody at once as God can. However, I'm sure that his minions are suitable for that task. Thus, if we are quiet and "listen", how do we know that what we think we're hearing is from God and not Satan? We know because we have already heard God's voice in His Word, the Scriptures. Even if we can subjectively hear from the spirit realm, we should use objective truth to interpret it. God has given us wisdom. That, coupled with the divine Word, can powerfully amplify the voice of God.
Is it possible that God speaks into our spirits in unique, personal ways? Sure it is. God can do whatever he wants. However, I find it harder to believe that God speaks to us in this fashion. If God is all powerful, and wants to speak with us, he will. If he does, we won't have to wonder. If we're really wondering if something is from God, and it doesn't line up with the Scriptures (At times even if it does), then it is very doubtful. Do you want to hear from God? Who doens't? Certainly, the practice of solitude is powerful and beneficial. However, I don't think I'm going to spend much time in silence simply for the reason of "hearing" from God. If God wishes to speak to me, he will do so in a manner that I cannot deny. Until then, if I'm wise, I will study and learn to obey the holy, precious words that he has given us, and to use the wisdom and discernment that he has given me otherwise.
Friends, search the scriptures. That's where you'll hear God's voice. As St. Augustine said, "All truth is God's truth", and this is the bedrock upon which that house of truth can be built. Know it well. "Do you best to present yourself to God as one appoved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed, but who correctly handles the word of truth."
Other than the Scriptures, my primary resources in this essay were articles by Greg Koukl, on the website www.str.org. The specific articles are called, "A Private Hotline to God?" and "Acts and the Voice of God."
I welcome disagreements and all other thoughts. I only ask that the former be scriptural and all be reasonable. Otherwise, God bless, and I may amend in the future as my understanding of this issue progresses.
Posted at 10:15 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Mar 13, 2006
Earth's Destruction and God's Death
This is just to get some thoughts out.
I had several most interesting dreams last night, though I only remember one sufficiently to detail any of it in writing. It was similar to the movie Armageddon, or this old G.I. Joe comic, or even Final Fantasy 7. I giant asteriod, I think perhaps about the size of our moon, was plunging towards the Earth. When it hit, it was certain that all life here would be wiped out, and perhaps even our planet would be hit so hard that it would break apart! I remember looking out of some window shortly before Earth's end, and musing that now, death was certain for us all. However, there were also many other people around me, and they didn't seem so concerned about it. Reminds me of Paul's statement that if Christ is not raised, "Let us eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!" So, very soon after that time, this asteroid hit. Oddly enough, I got to see it hit, from space. It was round, and when it hit Earth, the planet cracked pretty bad, but did not break apart. Life was quickly extinguished. (Naturally, in a dream, I was still "alive" to experience all this). However, this was not the end of the story. God was merciful to humanity and decided to restore life, according to certain fundamental principles of life. I realize that sounds confusing, and I don't remember exactly what these principles were. However, just as an example, a life principle is that of gender. That is, masculine and feminine go far deeper into life, into the universe, that just biological male and female. This is a fundamental aspect of life. So, God recreated Earth on a couple of similar principles.
Even more odd, this whole chain of events happened twice before moving on to other dreams. Then I woke up to get ready for work, and have these thoughts floating around in my head. Thoughts of pain, suffering, death, people lost, hopeless, apathetic, with no purpose, even in the face of certain destruction. I then had a new Zao song in my head, from their CD, The Funeral of God. Which, for those who dont' know, is a concept album about a world in which God got so fed up with the way humanity treated him, abused and ignored him, that he just decided to get up and leave us. Alone. The resulting picture is, as one might imagine, quite bleak. The particular song is called "The lesser lights of Heaven" and seems to be discussing the stars and their desire for their maker who has left them. It went well with the whole asteroid thing. That, and listening to this new David Crowder song haunted my thoughts for most of the morning. Although the exact effects it had on me are difficult to describe. Either way, being sincere and focused at work was difficult. I was very distracted, thinking about all of these things.
Pain and struggle and what I call 'existential agony' often plague my mind. People walk around, spiritual zombies! They have no purpose in this life, only drifting from moment to moment...and so many not even in intellectual pride like many professors, but just poor, purposeless, and in pain. As Ravi Zacharias relates in a story, to even try to listen to everybody's heart cry would be absolutely deafening! I don't know how such suffering does not also burder other's hearts. Perhaps they are too burdened with their own trials. However, these issues are is interrupted by what I perceive to be much foolishness. For example, this obsession with sports, Carolina, Duke, blah blah blah. Who cares? A bunch of guys are running back and forth and throwing a ball into a hoop. I have come more and more to despise these things. And yet people go fanatical for this. I don't understand it. Yet, people never cease to talk about this with great enthusiasm, indeed posessed by some spirit unbeknowst to me. I won't start on some rant about how nobody is serious about their faith, etc, because I'm just as guilty. But I do wonder where passion is, where purpose is, where we draw our battle lines, or do we even draw our lines for battle at all? Do we get out of our church bubbles and go reach the world, reach the streets, go to the hurting with the gospel? I don't, but I hate that. I want to, I want to reach all those around me, I want to do spiritual war, the idea is enthralling! Let us get out of this "Mist of the spirtual dimension", where "Satan has cursed thy mind." and "Awake, abandon mortal sin, truth thou shalt find!"
Now I'm just rambling. Enough for now.
Posted at 09:12 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Dec 28, 2005
Though there's no way I could do this subject justice in a blog entry of any kind, I feel the desire (haha...) to write out at least some of my thoughts concerning the matter. I'm not an expert on this subject, neither a philosopher or a psychologist. However, I shall endeavor to write from my heart, my thoughts and observations, even if they may not be objective truth.
Often, human desire and emotion are said to step from "the heart". I'm not exactly sure why that is, but even the ancient Hebrews talked about such things as being in their kidneys! Without going through all of history, we can see that men have frequently distinguished desires and emotions from mere intellect and rationality, seem to lie in the mind. While I am tempted to say that this is not true from a purely biological point of view - for without the mind there would be no consciousness to desire anything - I can understand the distinction. Everybody has experienced the brain, good reasoning, telling them to do one thing, while the emotions/desires say something quite different. Now, one could try to explain these things through a mass of biological hormones and psychological instincts. Again, I am not a scientist, so I won't get into such possibilities. Rather, how do we experience desire, and what causes it? What are our desires ultimately for?
It is helpful to reiterate C.S. Lewis in this matter. He describes in his book Mere Christianity that all desires must have a possible fulfillment. For example, he says that if somebody is hungry or thirsty, one can eat and drink and fulfill those desires. The physical hormones that drive the desire for sex; in the same way that desire can be fulfilled. To paraphrase Peter Kreeft of Boston College, "Imagine going to a planet where the aliens have no stomachs, and they never have. Yet they are always hungry. The very idea is absurd." Thus, it is logical that every physical desire must have some fulfillment. I can't think of any that do not. However, Lewis's point is that, if physical desires can be fulfilled, what about the desires of so many throughout time for something higher than themselves? Why have people historically worshipped some diety or dieties greater than themselves? Is there not a desire for something more than this earthly, human life, which, if nothing more exists, is ultimately meaningless? Lewis says that if we have this desire, then there must also be some means of satisfying it. Of course, that would be a real higher power, which he calls God.
I would agree with Lewis and Kreeft on those points. However, how can we recognize such desires and recognize them for what they are? First off, for a Christian, a desire that does not conform to God's Word, no matter how strong it may be, is impure and unholy, and should be purged. Easier said than done I realize. However, what about other desires for which we can find nothing explicit in His word? I will use two potent personal example of occasions when I experience what I might describe as transcendant desires. By transcendant, I mean those desires that somehow seem to superceed normal, explainable desires. They empower the 'heart' (Despite biological probablilities, it is still easiest to use the heart for the center of emotion/desire), and suggest something above and beyond normal experiences in life.
The first of these is music. I listen to a great deal of music, but not just any music. Good music for me must meet at least one of two criteria: Either they must praise God or be otherwise musically and/or lyrically profound and sincere. There are exceptions of course, but the more of those conditions that are met in a song the better. Here is where clear language begins to break down. It is hard to describe exactly what makes a song "profound". Typically, music that questions life, is very purposeful, or seeks the depths of human existence itself is very good. The music itself can be slow and sappy, or complex and melodic, or fast and very heavy. I could list many bands that I feel comply, but that's somewhat besides the point. Further, the desires that these kinds of music so powerfully evoke is also hard to describe. However, during the right song, the heart gets a tasts of....something higher and more profound than itself. At times, it is so brilliant that a kind of sonic euforia sets in, a psychological high if you will, but soley because of the music.
This brings me to another aspect of desire. We have already distinguished between mundane physical desires and desires for something beyond our normal experiences. Peter Kreeft says something like, "Even to suffer the pains of these highest desires is far greater than fulfilling the lower, base desires." Thus, it seems to me that to experience even a shadow of greater things, and this indeed can be painful psychologlcally, is more pleasurable than fulfilling, for example, one of the famous seven deadly sins, such as lust or greed. I generally find this to be quite true. Not that I am impervious to "carnal" sins, but when seeking these higher desires, normal fleshly desires do fade away and become trivial for the time being. Not that temptation is thus conquered. These greater desires do still invoke a strong longing, almost a kind of suffering. Even today, at the Renyolda House with my family, looking at the history of R.J. Renyolds and his family, this kind of desire came in hard. I had this song (again music), an intense choral piece in Latin from a movie, in my head very strongly. You can check it out (The music and the movie clip) for yourself at: http://media.putfile.com/final-fantasy-VII-Advent-Childrenavi72 Then, looking at this ornate house, and all of the beautiful details in it, especially the old turn of the century clothing (Though why that, I'm not exactly sure) I was struck with some unexplainable, intense desire for something, perhaps ideal beauty, but I cannot know for certain. Of course then the thought does tend to drift towards the opposite sex, which seems trivial in a sense. However, I think God endowed women with such a strong sense of beauty, and woman as God intended would be amazingly beautiful in every sense, and I think it a wonderful thing to admire how He has created them that way. But girls are another topic...haha.
Maybe I'm crazy; maybe I'm the only one who experiences such things in these ways. Or maybe there is something deeper here in the human psyche. Perhaps God has put these deep desires somewhere in each human heart so that we would seek him, seek the eternal, and seek truth. I know I experience many such desires, sometimes to the unfortunate apathy of other things that I should pay attention to, but nonetheless I hope to use such desires to seek God and his ways, and the reality of all that he has made in this world until He returns.
I don't know what else to add right now. It's certainly not an expert opinion as I said before, but perhaps it will stir up enough minds - and passions - to seek the truth for themselves. I hope so. Until I think of more, or write something fresh, remember....everything. But first and foremost, your creator. Grace and peace.
Posted at 01:45 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Oct 22, 2005
Suffering. Though some might argue as to the nature of suffering, few of a sane mind would doubt its ubiquitous nature. I will for this entry considering suffering to be either great physical or emotional distress or loss. This includes death of loved ones, illnesses, a life without purpose or love, severe injury, and anything else that causes great pain to human beings. I want to start here on a personal note, for this is how I came to write this in the first place. Obviously I know that suffering has always been a part of human history. The more history classes I take the more I realize that. I mean, we grieve, and not unjustly, at modern wars and their losses. Yet wars have been happening since the beginning of recorded human history! The same famines, killings, wars, injustices, cruelties, hatred, lust, and greed have existed throughout time as well as now. Further, the topic of suffering is a special one among Christians, for the issue of how to reconcile the plethora of the world's obvious suffering with a God who is all good remains a difficult question to answer satisfactorily. So, certainly the idea of suffering has been in my own mind my entire life. I have studied it in the Christian context. I seen my own loss, physical and emotional, and in my friends and family as well. So, after these and many other things, why talk about suffering now? Before further exploring these thoughts, I want to lay down some of the key Biblical verses concerning suffering.
Romans 5:3-5 "Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings; because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and charatcer, hope. And hope does not dissappoint us, for God has poured out his love into out hearts by the Holy Spirit whom he has given us."
James 1:2-3 "Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, for you know the testing of your faith develops perseverance. Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything."
2 Corinthians 1:3-5 "Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of compassion and the God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our troubles, so that we can comfort those in any trouble with the comfort we ourselves have received from God. For just as the sufferings of Christ flow over into our lives, so also through Christ our comfort overflows."
There are certianly more, but these are a sufficient foundation. This recent train of thought was probably started by hurricane Katrina and the massive damage done in LA and neighboring states. It was made very vivid to America, and we made a big deal of it. Yet, it was really stimulated by the massive earthquake in Kashmir, between India and Pakistan, where it is now estimated that over 50,000 people died in this event. Yes, less focus has been paid to this event, though it terms of human suffering it is far greater than Katrina. But that's not the point. The point is many people suffered horribly, and clean up/ministry to the affected is still greatly in progress. Then there was a landslide in Central America claiming at least 1,400 lives, and now there's another hurricane lashing Mexico and around the Florida Keys. This of course does not even begin to take into account the massive amount of human suffering every day. Thousands around the globe die daily from a multitude of causes, many suffering greatly in the process. Perhaps such things are too mundane to be of interest, or perhaps most people block them out becasue they are unpleast, and instead these people would rather seek after happiness, which excludes thoughts about suffering as much as possible. I can't say for sure. However, all of this stuff has become so much more personal in the past few days, though I am not the one suffering. For example, I was working (at Chick-fil-A) the other night, and there were a couple of men ordering some fodd, and for some reason is was taking a while. I apologized to them about their wait, then one of them said something to the effect of, 'Oh, this isn't a long wait. We just got back from the hospital where we were told that our father isn't going to make it.' I tried to express sympathy, and I wanted to do something for them , but I knew that I couldn't. I was shocked that somebody would tell me a thing like that when they didn't know me at all. I didn't have too much time to ruminate on it becasue I had other duties at work. However, it stuck firmly in my mind. Then, even the day after I think, one of my co-workers came in and reported that somebody who had been close to her had overdoesed on drugs and died. She was shaken up, and again I was shocked (Even more so by others' insensitivities to this pain).
Weeks, even months later, more thoughts of this nature plague me. I should not be surprised. Suffering is of course a normal part of life. Every human being who has every live and will ever live has and will suffer, some immensly. Even this night the haunting spectre of sudden pain, the very real possibility that a friend might lose a family member in the next couple of days, is a burden. Yes, all must someday die, even ourselves. Though we often don't think that way. Death is the great enemy of all that is good, the enemy of life. No matter how much we try to rationalize it, and say that death is "just a part of life" as in Brave New World for example, it is always unnatural.
I cannot get this song out of my mind. I have known it well for some time, and it hits home now more than ever, even though these sufferings are not yet my own. The song is Path of Pain by Crimson Moonlight, for the very few who might have an inkling of who they are. It describes a man on the path of life, suffering greatly. Then Jesus comes to him and talks with him. He tells the man that the Father has seen his pain, that he himself has walked with him the whole time, even if he was not seen. Jesus tells him that even if he does not know the purpose of his pain, he knows that he can trust in Jesus, for he walked much deeper, and bore far more burdens than anyone else ever has and ever could. He was "Made perfect in his suffering" for "The Christ has to suffer all these things..." The song is a poetic, powerful, profound look into pain and how we can relate it to our savior. In the end of the song, the wanderer is beside "The clear spring again." The suffering has passed, but he now knows much more about his Lord, and can trust in him the next time he must face suffering.
One more thought for now. I think o the story of Gary Habermas, author and professor at Liberty University. He discusses in Lee Strobel's books (Case for Christ, Easter, etc.) the story of how he lost his wife, I beleive it was to cancer. His academic focus and personal passion is the ressurection of Jesus Christ. As he watched his wife die, and after she died, he had many, many responses from students with a similar theme, to paraphrase: "If you really believe in the ressurection of Jesus, you know that you'll both be resurrected with him. If it was good enough for Jesus, is it not good enough for your wife as well?" The wonderful thing was, he actually found solace in that. The resurrection of Christ was so powerful and so real to him that he was comforted even in the loss of his greatest earthly treasure. Or, in closing, to use lyrics again, "The final cry of God's faultless, wounded Son brought freedom!"
In adendum, I have come to beleive that while yes, the scriptures are powerful, preaching them to a sufferer who does not alreayd believe them fully heart and soul is a meaningless endeavor. When somebody goes through pain, they don't want trite words but real love. If I suffer, I don't want to hear the verses I listed above, no matter how true they may be. I want sombody to be there who will cry with me if need be, somebody to "mourn with those who mourn", to be a friend and a brother/sister. We should "live a life of love" above all else. Truly, to try to listen to the heart cry of every suffering individual, even within a smaller group, would be deafening. However, does not God call us to preach healing to as many human hearts as possible, though loud indeed be their cries? Is that not what ministry is all about, reaching and loving and teaching and pointing to God as many as possible, though you know you're never reach them all?
I may never know for certain why humanity suffers in this our exile. Perhaps it will always burden my heart, whether it is personal or not. Father, let us yearn for Heaven, to rid ourselves of this Earthly land, for we long to be clothed with our heavenly dwelling...and not to be such miserable strangers in this world. Until we too die, and rise again with Christ, give us peace and strength to trust that you care for us even when we can't see it. "I have walked the whole path with you." Enough for now.
Posted at 10:09 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Sep 4, 2005
Thoughts of a Spontaneous Nature
I cannot help but think a few things this fair evening. First, anyone who's tried to live a healthy lifestyle with diet and exercise may still desire all the junk food that they ate before their diet. However, after the body gets to a point of being healthy in this manner, going back to eating junk food will likely have a powerful adverse effect. Before, the body was so used to what is essentially poisin that it was not so bad, but after being cleaned out, the next time that junk is put into the body, the body clearly recognizes it as such as honestly wants nothing to do with the foods that once customarily brought pleasure. Of course, I'm not just talking about diet here, this is a spiritual journal, and I don't care that much about healthy living anyway. However, there is a powerful spiritual parallel that rings loud right now for me. When we compromise with the world by enjoying the same kinds of entertainment as they do, or even at best sit around wasting our time and energy on "twinky" entertainment, that is, entertainment that is not necessarily evil but has not good merit to it either. To use the person exaple that is now on my mind, let us take movies for example. I used to watch movies just like pretty much anybody else, though I've always had standards of what I would watch. However, after trying to live a more holy life for a good bit of time, trying to come back to movies, with a few exceptions (LOTR, Star Wars, and The Passion among the main ones), is very difficult. I would honestly rather read a book, or discuss some weighty matter, or simply gain a new insight into somebody's heart, or lose myself on the guitar, or any number of a thousand other things. However, it just feels that most movies (and similar T.V. and music) are to my heart and soul now what junk food is to somebody who's been on a long diet. In stead of finding joy by finally relaxing and tuning out the world, I now cannot help but think of the world, where chaos reigns in our own country, where thousands die every day across the world, where in China alone ther are 50 million believers who desire God's Word but don't have it, and on and on and on. I am not trying to boast by saying that I am so spiritual that I am above movies and the like. I just have to wonder, would the apostles have sat down to watch the latest comedy or make sure they caught their favorite sitcom every week? Somehow, I have to doubt it. If that's the case, for those of us who call ourselves believers in Christ Jesus, why do we? Finally, let it be said that I am not alone in my thoughts. This final quote is from a ancient pagan stoic philosopher.
"Most of what passes for legitimate entertainment is inferior or foolish and only caters to or exploits people's weaknesses. Avoid being one of the mob who indulges in such pastimes. Your life is too short, and you have important things to do. Be discriminating about what images and ideas you let in your mind. If you yourself don't choose what thoughts and images you expose yourself to, someone else will, and their motives may not be the highest. It is the easiest thing in the world to slide imperceptibly into vulgarity. But there's no need for that to happen if you determine not to waste your time and attention on mindless pap."
—Roman philosopher Epictetus (AD 55-135), in his work The Art of Living
Until next time, be revolutionaries! The world needs so many more of them...see how many ways you can be different or exceptional. The time is too short to dally...
Posted at 10:17 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Aug 21, 2005
The Songs of a Longing Heart
I know nobody even reads this, but I don't care. I just felt like putting down perhaps my top ten favorite songs to give an insight into how I think about things through music, which is very powerful to me. So in no particular order, here they are, and some have links to videos if applicable (When they decide to work that is).
1. Punishment Divine by Blind Guardian
2. And Then There Was Silence by Blind Guardian
3. Path of Pain by Crimson Moonlight
4. Inferno by Extol
5. Confined by As I Lay Dying
6. This is Love by Cool Hand Luke
7. Speechless by Steven Curtis Chapman
8. Duel of the Fates by John Williams (though it's a piece, not technically a song)
9. The Power of the Cross by Chris Tomlin
10. All Creatures of Our God and King by David Crowder
Ok, I know that's short. I wish I could express why many of these have so much meaning, but perhaps that's why they are so powerful when words will not do. Again, nobody cares, but hey. Ok, off to do something of meaning now...later
Posted at 04:30 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Jul 29, 2005
The Persistant Potency of Pride
I feel that there is another issue that I should write about, one that's been a huge problem for a long time, but that is more firmly lodged in my mind after some of the things said this past Wednesday night. This issue is none other than the sin and great struggle of pride.
To begin, I wish to share some of my favorite song lyrics ever. This is from a song called Punishment Divine by a German metal band called Blind Guardian. This line goes:
"Surrounded by night, I've been offered insight, there is none but the sin of pride. Am I wrong, am I right, am I losing my sight? Abandoning the superior mind."
I think of these words very often when I go outside to pray, because they seem so fitting to my condition. For, honesty convicts me to say that pride is a major struggle with me a great deal of the time. However, I know that it's not just me. Thus, in order to learn a little bit more about what God says about this issue and to learn how to better combat this sin, let us take a fuller look at pride in all its glory.
There are several verses in scripture that speak of pride and its opposite, humility. Let us start off with an example from two of the prominent church leaders of the early Church.
Not ever the early apostles were without blame. In Galatians, Paul writes of a confrontation with Peter. He says,
When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. Before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?
Now here is Peter, an esteemed Church leaders, the man appointed as the rock upon which the church will be built. You might think that he was beyond reproach. However, this was not the case, as he ended up changing his behavior in front of these Jews to save face, which was tantamount to playing favorites, as all were part of Christ's body. Paul rightly rebuked him. However, think of one of us might act in Peter's case? Would we readily see the wisdom in Paul's reproach, or would we try to justify our actions in our pride? Even though Peter must have known the truth in Paul's words, surely they hurt his pride all the same. Peter did the godly thing and accepted a wise man's rebuke, as the Proverbs often say to do. Perhaps this is why Peter later writes in his own letter, "Finally, all of you, live in harmony with one another; be sympathetic, love as brothers, be compassionate and humble." He could truly urge others to be humble becasue he had experience with humbling himself for the sake of the Church and the Kingdom of God. However, there are many other exortations in the New Testament concerning pride too.
1 Peter 5:6 - "Young men, in the same way be submissive to those who are older. All of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because, "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble."Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time.
James 4:10 - "Humble yourselves before the Lord, and he will lift you up."
Luke 14:10-11 - "But when you are invited, take the lowest place, so that when your host comes, he will say to you, 'Friend, move up to a better place.' Then you will be honored in the presence of all your fellow guests. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted."
Ephesians 4:2 - "Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love."
One of the best examples of humility is Jesus' own. Phillipians 2:8 says, "And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death—even death on a cross!"
(WORK IN PROGRESS!!)
Posted at 02:17 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Jul 13, 2005
Worship - What a Word. What it is.
Ok, last time I discussed how in the modern protestant church the term "worship" is often used to denote music of some kind. I gave several reasons why I thought that music as worship can become a problem. However, this time I'd like to describe what worship really is in the Biblical sense, that is, a total devotion to God.
Let me start by saying that music is a part of worship, especially in church liturgy. One only has to peer through the lenses of history to see that music has had a prominent place in the church for a long time. The example that springs to mind is that of the famous composer J.S. Bach. He was a brilliant German composer, and much of his masterful music was composed for his church. Also, many have heard of Handel's Messiah, a glorious depiction of Christ in musical form. These melodies are beautiful to God's ears, and there is no Biblical basis to renounce such things. Further, even the Biblical writers often referred to using music to worship the Lord. Ten times in the book of Chronicles the righteous kings of Judah used musical instrments to praise the Lord. What's more, seven psalms are headlined With Stringed Instruments (Psalms 4, 6, 54, 55, 61, 67, 76). Many more Psalms are marked For the Director of Music. Finally, Ephesians 5:19 says, "Speak to one another with psalms, hymns and spiritual songs. Sing and make music in your heart to the Lord." Thus, from this simple analysis we can see that music has definitely played an important part in Christian worship, from Biblical times forward. What then, you ask, am I trying to say by stating that music has traditionally been important but today is often not good? The truth is, there is nothing wrong with music as worship. The problem is that worship is far, far, more than music. I think that if we exclude these other aspects of worship by only focusing on music, we are doing wrong.
Next, let us look at some Biblical words used to denote worship, and their contexts. All of the information in this paragraph I am taking from the 1997 edition of Vine's Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words. The Greek word most commonly translated as "Worship" is the verb proskuneo, which comes from the preposition pros, meaning "to or towards", and the verb kuneo, meaning "to kiss". It is more commonly understood to refer to an act of homage or reverence, whether to God or Jesus or even another man. There are countless examples of this word being used. A second verb is sebomai, meaning to revere, with emphasis on the feeling of awe and/or devotion. This word is used in Matt 15:9, Acts 16:14, 19:27, etc. The verb latreuo means "To serve, to render religious service or homage." There are several other minor Greek words, but these will suffice for the moment. However, it is clear that none of these words refer to anything musical, rather obesiance, awe, and service.
Obviously, there is a lot in the OT about worship, but I don't know anything about Hebrew, and Vine's doesn't give any information, so while I might mention a couple of OT examples, I will mainly focus on NT passages about worship. Next, we will look at some specific passages of scripture that speak of worship.
Many OT references refer to the worshipper bowing down, often with their faces to the ground in reverence. To give merely one example, 2 Chronicles 20:18 says, "Jehoshaphat bowed with his face to the ground, and all the people of Judah and Jerusalem fell down in worship before the LORD." There are many more OT examples, but again, that is not the main focus of this article.
Matthew 2:11 speak of the Wise Men* coming to visit the baby Jesus. "On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh." This is similar to Jehoshaphat's worship of the Lord earlier. We can learn from this that the Wise Men made a great sacrifice of time and money (Their gifts were very costly), and came to humble themselves before a child, recognizing his greatness. There are many other examples, including Jesus' temptation, where worship could be used as "render status to", as when Satan demanded that Jesus worship him, which would accord Satan a higher position than Jesus. In Matthew 14:33, after Jesus walked on water, he got into the boat, and "Those who were in the boat worshiped him, saying, 'Truly you are the Son of God.'" What was their recorded act of worship? They recognized the true status of Jesus as the Son of God and their own inferiority in comparison.
Luke tells us of an old prophetess named Anna at the temple while the baby Jesus was being presented there. Luke tells us that Anna "Never left the temple but worshiped night and day, fasting and praying." (Luke 2:37) Anna did more than aclaim greatness to God, she disciplined herself to continually fast and pray before Him as her offering.
Paul has many things to say about worship as well. The famous passage in Romans 12:1-2 says,
"Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God—this is your spiritual act of worship. Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will."
Thus, worship according to this passage is 1. To sacrifice your body to God, presumably for acts of discipline (like Anna) and service, and 2. Renew your mind by dissasociating your life from the pattern of the world, e.g., don't think and do what the world thinks and does. This kind of worship involves continual work, for sacrifice, whether mental or physical, is not easy.
Paul further exorts Timothy in proper worship in 1 Timothy Chapter 2. He says,
"I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone— for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This is good, and pleases God our Savior...I want men everywhere to lift up holy hands in prayer, without anger or disputing. I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God." (vv. 1-3, 8-9)
If we now move to the end of the Bible to the book of Revalation, we can get a glimpse of how worship goes in in the intimacy of God's court in Heaven. Chapter 4, verses 9-11 say,
"Whenever the living creatures give glory, honor and thanks to him who sits on the throne and who lives for ever and ever, the twenty-four elders fall down before him who sits on the throne, and worship him who lives for ever and ever. They lay their crowns before the throne and say: 'You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.'"
These mysterious elders thus do several things in their worship of God: They accord to him glory. God is very jealous for His glory (See John Piper for more on this) They give him honor and thanks, recognizing what he has done for them. They humbly prostrated themselves before the throne, so unworthy were they in comparison. They give their crowns, any power, wealth, or worth they have in themselves they give to God. Finally, they praise him for his mighty acts of creation and sovereign will.
Later in that same book, John is so overwhelmed by the images that the angel is showing him that John begins to worship him, but the angel quickly reminds him, "Do not do it! I am a fellow servant with you and with your brothers who hold to the testimony of Jesus. Worship God!" Thus God alone is worthy of worship, and though that sounds so simple, even the disciple John let this slip caught in the majesty of all he had seen.
Thus, after giving a scriptural summary of worship, how can we breifly summarize so that we may apply it to our lives? First off, remember that worship involves according the right status and relationship to God. Second, that recognition involves proper actions, like Anna did and Paul wrote about. It is giving to God recognition and thanks for his wonderful deeds in history. It is giving to him our most valuable posessions, our "crowns". Finally, I think a good summary is given by Christian teacher and apologist Ravi Zacharias, who quotes Archbiship William Temple. He says, "Worship is the submission of all of our nature to God. It is the quickening of conscience by his holiness, nourishment of mind by his truth, purifying of imagination by his beauty, opening of the heart to his love, and submission of will to his purpose. And all this gathered up in adoration is the greatest expression of which we are capable."
So be it. I pray we all learn to worship properly God as he is worthy of it.
Comments, questions, etc. are welcome. If you think I am wrong on any of this, please show me from the Bible how so and I will change it. Or if you have an ideas of anything to add that I forgot, please let me know! Grace and peace to all. Amen.
*For those interested in history, Matthew refers to these wise men as Magi from the east. The Greek historian Herodotus speaks of a tribe of the Medes called Magi. Media was certainly east of the Holy Land. Media is also closely assiciated with the Achaemenid Persians, who ruled Asia/Middle East around the 5th and 6th centuries B.C. We also find the Persians in the biblical books of Daniel, Nehemiah/Ezra, and Esther.
Posted at 05:05 pm by phil6183
Permalink
Jul 10, 2005
Worship-What a Word. What It Isn't
I was going to write about something else, but I realized how this issue has been going around a lot recently, and I would like to address it. Of course, keep in mind that I'm no Ph.D theologian or anything, nor do I wish to spend hundreds of hours on this. Still, with these things in mind, let us see what true worship of God looks like. Disclaimer: These are my thoughts and interpretations, I am not perfect. You might not agree with what I say. If this is so, feel free to disagree and tell me why you disagree. This is done to clarify my own thoughts, and hopefully teach somebody something that will lead them to a closer relationship with God. This are my motives.
First, I cannot help but be a little cynical as I talk about the frequent modern Protestant use of the term "worship". Let me preface this by saying that I don't intend to attack anybody with these comments, but rather just to get a point across. For example, I really like my own church a great deal, but of course no church is perfect. However, I constantly hear the phrase, "What kind of worship are we going to have?", "Let us enter into a time of worship now", "What a wonderful time of worship", etc. Of course, these phrases are almost always used in the context of music. Even the people that know better still use similar terms to describe this kind of "worship". Now, if you asked some of those people to define this word, they might use more inclusive terms. Yet the common perception is that somehow "A time of worship" is synonymous with a band singing some "Praise and Worship" songs. It has gotten to the point where I believe that several detrimental things have happened as a result.
First, my own experience has involved a lot of upbeat, modern music. In this experience, many common songs are often repeated. Sometimes these same songs are used so much that they can easily become trite and meaningless. I can't count how many times I've been singing "I could Sing Of Your Love Forever" or "Amazing Love" or others and thinking about something totally different at the same time. Of course, this is me, not everybody, and there is certainly nothing wrong with any of these songs in themselves. I think the point is clear though that any music, done too frequently, can lose whatever meaning it may have had when it was new. I firmly believe that true worship should come from the heart (See John 4:24, Matt 22:37, etc). Even if music can be used to worship God in this way, everybody will express their hearts differently to God, and singing the same songs will never accomplish this. For example, I may have more passion and heart connection with God while screaming along with the hard rock band Disciple. However, another person may love the old hymns, and their heart with God is there. Very different music, but both people are singing from their hearts.
The second aspect of musical "worship" is a tendency to make a kind of idol out of the music. It seems that churches/ministries feel like they just have to have music as a part of their presentation, or...what? People will hate them? God will smite them? I'm not sure exactly. If somebody suggested replacing music with something else, the other person will look at that person as if they were crazy. "What, not do music? What are we going to do for worship?" Maybe I stretch this a bit, but not too far. Certainly, music is nice to have, but to insist that we have it in our times together seems to say that we are a bit more focused on the music itself than the Spirit of the God it is supposed to be uplifting.
Third, but going along with "worshipping" the music, is that music can often be a distraction from other aspects of the Christian life. For example, a church wants to have a great band of musicians. This is not wrong. However, think of what all goes into making this music become reality. First, musical equipment is very expensive (I know, I play guitar) and professional gear can easily run into the thousands of dollars. Then, once a group has the gear, they have to practice. This can easily go several hours per session (Again, I know, I've done this). Finally, when it comes time for performance, the band may play/sing anywhere, on average, between three and 10 songs. This could run up to another 20-30 minutes easily. Thus, in the end, all of this music ends of being a great investment in time, money, and energy. Certainly, this is not all in vain. Much good has come out of music in the Church throughout history. However, think of it this way: If we as believers took those same thousands of dollars and many hours per week, and seriously devoted them to evangelism and relationships with others, especially unbelievers, what could we see happen? Another example: Few people realize how far American dollars will go overseas. $5 dollars can buy a Bible for Chinese Christians who desperately want to have the Word. Or a few dollars can buy a great deal of Christian literature in Asian nations. Finally, a Asian missionary can give a whole month of passionate ministry to his own people for a total of $90/month. The whole point here is this: We could reach out to the world very easily if we wished, and I think when we focus too much on things like music we neglect these other areas of our Christian duties.
Fourth, and finally for now, I believe that a lot of modern music, in contrast with many older hymns, have very little substance. I could go through my song folder and prove this. Try it yourself: take you average "worship" song and compare its lyrics with an older hymn. For example, "In Christ Alone", "Be Thou My Vision", "Come Thou Fount" and a personal favorite, written by St. Francis of Assisi, "All Creatures of Our God and King" are all wonderful hymns that have powerful, deep lyrics. I think that many - not all - modern songs lack this kind of substance. Decide for yourself.
Ok, this is all I can think of for now. I may add more later. However, this is just what I find wrong with the modern idea of "worship". I'll write the next part about what the proper, Biblical definition of worship really is. Until then, grace and peace.
Phil
Posted at 05:09 pm by phil6183
Permalink
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|